An Explication of Vygotskian Sociocultural Theory as Evidenced by Ethomethodological Findings

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

For centuries the speculations on man's mental functioning posed a great challenge for the scholars in various disciplines such as philosophy, psychology, sociocultural studies, education, ethnolinguistics, discourse analysis, literary criticism. Researchers have been pondering over the ticklish question: is it the mind making the human society, or is it the society that shapes up the human mind? Researchers not informed in Vygotsky's contribution to the resolution of the issue, may still find the vicious circular question glaring in the face. But thanks to Vygotsky's sociocultural theory (SCT), the hazy horizon has cleared away and today we are convinced of the truth of Vygotsky's claim that man's mental functioning is mediated by sociocultural artifacts (physical and psychological tools) which imbue us with the capacity the shape natural environment, and in so doing change the natural circumstances in which we live, and the capacity to organize and gain voluntary control over our biologically specified mental functioning. The pivotal concept in this outlook is that man, released from biological constraints, emerges as the master of his own destiny. It goes without saying that a conception as such invests the educationists, social reformers, statesmen with a grave responsibility regarding the necessity of providing appropriate conditions for individual's cognitive, ethical and social development. Indeed, Vygotsky's position on the genesis of man's higher mental functioning which is said to be hinging on the social, cultural, and historical variables provides a viable solution to the mind-society enigma. This said, we intend to submit some ethnomethodological evidence in support of Vygotsky's claim regarding the genesis of man's higher mental conditioning.

Keywords

References

Button, G. (1991). Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program.New York: Roman and Littlefield.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology.Inglewood and N. J. Prentice Hall.
Gurwitsch, C. (1964). A Field of Consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Haritage, J. (1987). Ethnomethodology.In A. Gidden& J. Turner (Eds.),Social Theory Today. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Haritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Hilbert, R. (1992). The Classical Roots of Ethnomethodology. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006).Sociocultural theory and the second languageDevelopment: Oxford.
Lynch, M. (1985). Sceintic Practice and Ordinary Action, Ethomethodology and social studies of science.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riley, P. (1981). Towards a contrastive pragmalinguistics.In Contrastive linguistics and the language teacher. J. Fisiak (Ed.) Pergamon Institute of English. 
Maynard, D. W., &Clayman, S. E. (1991).The diversity of Ethnomethodology.Annual review of sociology17, 385-418.
Rawls, A. (2002). In H. Garfunkel (Ed.), Ethonomethodology’s program.Working out Durkheim’sAphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Sharrock, W. W., & Anderson, B. (1986).The Ethomethodologists. London: Tavistock.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The Genesis of Higher Mental Functions. In J. W. Wertisch (Ed.) The Concept of activity in soviet psychology. Amonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge. Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Whalen, J. (1992). Conversation Analysis. In E. F. Borgatta& M. L. Borgatta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology .New York: Mcmillan.
Wilson, T. P., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1980).Ethnomethodolgy, Sociology, and Theory.Humboldt journal of social relations,7, 52-88.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1988). On Conversation: The Conversation Analytic Perspective. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook  (406-432). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
 
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics