The Ideology of Iranian National Television in News Presentation: A Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective

Document Type : Research Paper


1 University of New South Wales, Australia

2 Shiraz University, Iran


Media in general and news in particular constitute indispensable parts of modern life. TV news which contains visual elements in addition to the verbal aspects was used as the corpus of this study. In fact, this research culled out the ideologies of Iranian national television in presenting different issues. To be more precise, three internationally-significant pieces of news reports were chosen: one positive to “Us”, one hostile to “Others”, and one neutral. Then, these news reports were analyzed in detail and their lexical items, grammatical structures, and rhetorical figures were compared to find out about the differences. The results of the study showed that these three reports were presented to the audience via totally different strategies and ideologically-laden words were used to convey positive and negative meanings. In addition, the visual elements (angles, gaze, and distance) corroborated the findings of the verbal sections. The findings of this study show that lexical and grammatical choices are made purposefully in the media. So, it can be said that the results of this research contribute to the fields of linguistics, semiotics, and media.


Abbasi, Z. (2009). /barrasie agahi haye bazargani televizion az didgahe az didgahe goftman shenasie enteghadi/. Unpublished MA thesis, Azad University of Shiraz, Iran.
Alavinia, M. & Jalilifar, A. (2013). We believe the Iranian nation can: The manifestation of power in Iranian televised presidential debates. Language and Communication, 33, 8-25.
Barbe, K. (2008). Propaganda in the trivial: puzzles in the women's section of the Völkischer Beobachter. Discourse and Communication , 2 (2), 115-141.
Baruh, L., & Popescu, M. (2008). Guiding metaphors of nationalism: the Cyprus issue and the construction of Turkish national identity in online discussions. Discourse and Communication , 2 (1), 79-96.
Bednarek, M. & Caple, H. (2012). News Discourse. London: Continuum.
Behnam, B. & Khodadust, M. R. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of the event of September 11, 2001 in American and Syrian print media discourse.  The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 23-50.
Behnam, B. & Moshtaghi, R. (2008). A contrastive critical analysis of Iranian and British newspaper reports on the Iran nuclear power program. Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use, 29,  199-218.
Bertnard, M. (2009). The Importance of Considering Multiple Semiotic Resources in the Study of Race Talk. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Symposium About Language and Society – Austin. 53, pp. 50-61. Austin: Texas Linguistic Forum.
Caple, H., & Knox, J. S. (2012). Online news galleries, photojournlaism and the photo essaay. Visual Communication, 11 (2), 207-236.
Crisell, A. (1994). Understanding Radio (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Deghat, S. (2009). The CDA of the USA 2008 Presidential Campaign Speeches of Democratic Candidates with Respect to their Gender and Race. Unpublished MA thesis, Shiraz, Iran.
Fairclough, N. L. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (2001). CDA as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Fairclough, N. L. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
Gavriely-Nuri, D. (2010). The idiosyncratic language of Israeli 'peace': A Cultural appoach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CCDA). Discourse and Society , 21 (5), 565-585.
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2001). Emotion Within Situated Activity. In A. Duranti, Linguistic anthropology: a reader. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
Hakam, J. (2009). The `cartoons controversy': a Critical Discourse Analysis of English-language Arab newspaper discourse. Discourse and Society , 20 (1), 33-57.
Hodge, R.I.V., & Kress, G.R. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Jalilifar, A. & Alavinia, M. (2012). We are surprised; wasn’t Iran disgraced there? A functional analysis of hedges and boosters in televised Iranian and American presidential debates. Discourse and Communication, 6, 135-161.
Khosravinik, M. (2009). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election. Discourse and Society , 20 (4), 477-498.
Kjær, A. L., & Palsbro, L. (2008). National identity and law in the context of European integration: the case of Denmark. Discourse and Society , 19 (5), 599-627.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Lean, M. L. (2008). New Kids on the Block: The Discursive Construction of two New Premiers by the Mass Media. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines , 2, 59-75.
Leary, J. P. (2009). Urban Exclusion, Civil society, and the Politics of Television in Venezuela. Social Text , 27, 25-53.
Lindgren, S. (2009). Representing otherness in youth crime discourse: youth robberies and racism in the Swedish Press 1998-2002. Critical Discourse Studies , 6 (1), 65-77.
Mihelj, S., Bajt, V., & Pankov, M. (2009). Television news, narrative conventions and national imagination. Discourse and Communication , 30 (1), 57-78.
Montgomery, M. (2007). The discourse of broadcast news: a linguistic approach. London: Routledge.
Rasti, A. & Sahragard, R. (2012). Actor analysis and action delegitimation of the participants involved in Iran’s nuclear power contention: A case study of The Economist, 29, 729-748.
Rahimi, A., & Sahragard, R. (2007). Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Jungle
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
Rodriguez, A. R. (2008). Discursive strategies in Chavez's political discourse: voicing, distancing, and shifting. Critical Discourse Studies , 5 (2), 133-152.
Trew, T. (1979). What the papers say: linguistic variation and ideological difference. In R. Folwer, B. Hodge, G. Kress, & T. Trew, Language and Control (pp.117-157). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse and Society , 3 (1), 87-118.
van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. London: Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, Power and Access. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, & M. Coulthard, Texts and Practices (pp. 71-83). London and New York: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Ideology and discourse analysis. Retrieved from:
van Dijk, T.A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(3), 359–383.
van Dijk, T. A. (2009). News Discourse and Ideology. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch, Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 191-204). London: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C.R. Caldas Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.) Texts and practices (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
van Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (2001). Handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.) Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE.
Wodak, R., & van Dijk, T.A. (2000). Racism at the top, Drava, Austrian Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Austria.