Home Articles List Article Information
Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 11 (2018)
Volume Volume 10 (2017)
Volume Volume 9 (2016)
Volume Volume 8 (2015)
Volume Volume 7 (2014)
Volume Volume 6 (2013)
Volume Volume 5 (2012)
Volume Volume 4 (2011)
Volume Volume 3 (2010)
Volume Volume 2 (2009)
Volume Volume 1 (2008)
Faghih, E., Bahman, M. (2010). A Contrastive Study of Theme in English and Azerbaijani Turkish Fictional Texts. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 3(6), 55-69.
Esmail Faghih; Masumeh Bahman. "A Contrastive Study of Theme in English and Azerbaijani Turkish Fictional Texts". Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 3, 6, 2010, 55-69.
Faghih, E., Bahman, M. (2010). 'A Contrastive Study of Theme in English and Azerbaijani Turkish Fictional Texts', Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 3(6), pp. 55-69.
Faghih, E., Bahman, M. A Contrastive Study of Theme in English and Azerbaijani Turkish Fictional Texts. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 2010; 3(6): 55-69.

A Contrastive Study of Theme in English and Azerbaijani Turkish Fictional Texts

Article 4, Volume 3, Issue 6, Winter and Spring 2010, Page 55-69  XML PDF (87.9 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
Authors
Esmail Faghih* 1; Masumeh Bahman2
1South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
Thematisationis one of the troublesome areas both for translation purposes from or into English and also for learning EFL. The main reason for the problem lies in the fact that usually different languages structure thematisation in different ways. Therefore, the present research is an attempt to investigate contrastively: experiential (topical), interpersonal and textual themes in a sample of Azeri Turkish and English short stories. Specifically, it aims to find out whether these three kinds of themes have similar occurrences in these two languages or not. To characterize thematising in fictional texts on an empirical basis the model of analyzing theme as suggested by Halliday (2002) is applied to a small corpus of two short stories. The study revealed that in both English and Azeri Turkish, experiential, textual and interpersonal themes are used more frequently in this order respectively. It is hoped that the results of this study can contribute to both theoretical and applied linguistics.
Keywords
experiential; interpersonal and textual theme; rheme
References

Ahmadi Givee, H. (2005). Dastoor-e-Tatbighee ye Zabane Turkiva Farsi (Comprative Grammar of Turkish & Farsi Languages). Tehran: Ghatre.

Behzadi, B. (2003). Farhange Azerbaijani-Farsi (Azerbaijani Persian Dictionary). Tehran: Farhang Moaser.

Behzadi, B. (2007). Dastoor-e-Zaban-e-Azerbaijani (Grammar of Azerbaijani). Special Issue of Azeri, 16 & 17, Summer & Fall. 1386.

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983).Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downing, A. (2001). Thematic Progression as a Functional Resource in Analyzing Text. Retrieved December 8, 2007 , from http://www.ucm.es/info/circulo/no%/downing.htm

Faghih, E. (1997). A Contrastive Analysis of the Persian & English Definite Articles. IRAL. XXXV/2May.

Fischer, M. (1980).Iran: From Religious Dispute to Revolution. Cambridge: Mass: Harvard University Press.

Faulkner, W. That Evening Sun. In Perrine, L. Literature Structure, Sound, & Sense. (1995). New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. (2002). Linguistic Studies of Text & Discourse. J. Webster (Ed.). (Vol.2).London: Continum.

Heyat, J. (2000). SayreedarTarikhZabanvaLahjehayeTurki (A Survey of the History of Turkish Languages & Dialects). Tehran: Paykan Publishers.

Hasselgard, H. (2000, 02,14,17). More on Word Order & Thematic Structure. [lecture]. Retrieved December 5, 2007, from :http://folk.uio.no/hhasselg/systemic/textual.htm

Lassen, I. (2004).Ideational Resources in Biotechnology Press Release: Pattern of Theme / Rheme & Given/New. In L. Young & C. Harrison (Eds.).Systematic Functional Linguistics & Critical Discourse Analysis: Studies in Social Change (pp.264-279). London: Continuum.

Marefat, H., & Tahririan, M.H.  (2001). Information Structure in Persian. Iranian Journal of Humanities, 8 (2), 25-30.

McCarthy, M. (1991).Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C., Platt, J.,& Platt, H. (1992).Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied linguistics. London: Longman.

Sabahi, G. Arsiz Ghaffar(The Shameless Ghaffar). In M. Sobhdel, & F. Mirhasanpour (Eds.).(2004). Azerbaijan Hekayalari (The Collection of Azerbaijanian Short Stories) (Vol.1)(pp.47-64).Urumiah :Yaz Publications.

Shokouhi, H., & Kamyab, Gh. (2004). Analysing Discourse: Multivariant Perspectives. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Press.

Stillar, G.F. (1998).Analyzing Every day Texts: Discourse, Rhetoric, & Social Perspectives. California: Sage Publications.

Widdowson, H.G. (1975). Linguistic Insights & Language Teaching Principles. In C.Gutknecht (Ed.): From Linguisticum, (Vol.III)Communicative Linguistics(pp. 1-28).Language, Geneva.

Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia. Azerbaijani Language.Retrived November 5,2010, from : http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Azerbaijani_language

Yarmohammadi, L. (1995). Textual Analysis of English & Persian Written Texts in contrast & Its Possible Pedagogical Implications.In L. Yarmohammadi (Ed.), Fifteen Articles in Contrastive Linguistics & the Structure of Persian : Grammar, Text & Discourse (pp. 101-123). Tehran: Rahnama Publication.

Zehtabi, M.T. (2005). Azerbaijan TurkjasininNahvi (Syntax of Azeri Turkish). Tabriz: Akhtar.           

Statistics
Article View: 414
PDF Download: 239