Language Skill-Task Corollary: The Effect of Decision-Making vs. Jigsaw Tasks on Developing EFL Learners’ Listening and Speaking Abilities

Abbasian, Gholam-reza; Chenabi, Farzaneh

|
|
|
How to cite
RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
|
Share

	Language Skill-Task Corollary: The Effect of Decision-Making vs. Jigsaw Tasks on Developing EFL Learners’ Listening and Speaking Abilities
Article 1, Volume 9, Issue 18, Winter and Spring 2016, Page 1-24 PDF (268.27 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
Authors
Gholam-reza Abbasian ¹; Farzaneh Chenabi²
¹Department of English Language, Islamic Azad University, South Branch
²Department of English, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Task-based language Teaching (TBLT) has occupied the pertinent literature for some long years. However, the role of specific task type in developing specific skill type seems to be amongst the intact issues in the literature. To shed more light on this issue, the present study was conducted to compare the effect of jigsaw and decision-making tasks on improving listening and speaking abilities of EFL learners. To this end, 75 female Iranian EFL learners, assumed homogenous based on their performance on the Nelson Test, were employed as the participants. Their listening and speaking abilities were also measured both before and after the treatment based on the listening and speaking subtests of the PET. Then, they were assigned to two groups of experimental A and B. The experimental group A received decision-making-based listening and speaking instruction for 12 sessions of 45 minutes, and the experimental group B received jigsaw-based listening and speaking instruction. In order to analyze the data, descriptive statistics and multiple inferential statistical analyses were conducted. The results revealed that those participants who experienced jigsaw listening and speaking tasks outperformed those who received decision-making-based instruction. The findings, then, bear certain theoretical implications for stakeholders.
Keywords
task types; decision-making task; jigsaw task; listening and speaking skills


References
Boston, J. S. (2009). Pre-task syntactic priming and focused task design. ELT Journal, 64 (2), 165-174. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interaction approach to language Pedagogy. (2^nd Ed.). San Francisco, NY: Longman. Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bruton, A. (2002). From tasking and purposes to purposing tasks. ELT Journal, 56 (3), 280-283. Burnett, R. (1993). Conflict in collaborative decision-making. In C. Thralls, & N. Bryler, (Eds.), The social perspective and professional communication: Diversity and directions in research (pp. 144-163). London: SAGE Publications. Buyukkarci, K. (2009). A critical analysis of task-based learning. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17 (1), 313-320 Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.1-20). London, UK: Longman. Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J.C. Richards, J.C. & R. W. Schmidt (2010), Language and Communication (pp. 29-44) London: Longman. Ellis, R., (2001). Introduction: Investigating Form-Focused Instruction Language Learning. Supplement 1: Form-Focused Instruction and Second. Language Learning, 51, 1–46. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Folse, Keith. (2006). The art of teaching speaking. Michigan: Michigan University Press. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics,19, 1-23. Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2^ndend). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1993). Implementing cooperative learning. Education Digest, 58 (8), 62-66. Retrieved November 20, 2000 from EBSCOhost online database. Kemp, L. (2009). The listening log: Motivating autonomous learning. ELT Journal, 64 (4), 385-395. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1991). Language learning tasks: Teacher intention and learner interpretation. ELT Journal, 45: 98-107. Lee, J. F. (2000). Tasks and communication in language classrooms. New York: McGraw-Hill. Long, M. (1989). ‘Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input’ Applied Linguistics 4(2), 126-41. Long, M. & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design.TESOL Quarterly 26(1):27-56. Malihah, Noor (2010) .The Effectiveness of Speaking Instruction through Task-Based Language Teaching. REGISTER, 3 (1), 85-101. ISSN 1979-8903 McCarthy, Michael / McCarten, Jeanne / Sandiford, Helen (2006). Touchstone 4. Teacher's Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nunan, D. (1989a). Designing task for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press. Nunan, D. (1996). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nunan, D. (1997). Approaches to teaching listening in the language classroom. Retrieved December 2002 from: www.well.com/user/greg/KOTESOL/1997_proceedings/nunan_david.pdf Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 63-90. Pica,T. (1992). The textual outcomes of native speaker—nonnative speaker negotiation: what do they reveal about second language learning. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (1992), Text and Context: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives in Language Study (Eds). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second- language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527 Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Richards, J. C, & Theodore S. Rodgers, (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J. C, and Renandya, W.A. ( 2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics. London: Pearson Edition Published Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and observers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 11-232. Skehan, P. (1996). A Framework for the Implementation of Task-Based Instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17 (1), 38-62 Swain M. (1985). Communicative Competence: some roles of comprehensible input and its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (1985) (eds.) Input in second Language Acquisition (pp.235-245).Rowley Mass.: Newbury House Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.) Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Thanajaro, M. (2000). Using authentic materials to develop listening comprehension in the English as a second language classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University- Blacksburg. Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wesche, M. & P. Skehan (2002). “Communicative, task-based and content-based language instruction”. In R. Kaplan, The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp.207-228). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing Task-based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Statistics Article View: 641 PDF Download: 481