Home Articles List Article Information
Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 11 (2018)
Volume Volume 10 (2017)
Volume Volume 9 (2016)
Volume Volume 8 (2015)
Volume Volume 7 (2014)
Volume Volume 6 (2013)
Volume Volume 5 (2012)
Volume Volume 4 (2011)
Volume Volume 3 (2010)
Volume Volume 2 (2009)
Volume Volume 1 (2008)
Tabatabaei, M., Khasseh Khan, K., Gavidelnia, N., Ramzi, S. (2017). On the Differential Effects of Computer-Mediated and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 10(20), 151-168.
Mir Ayyoob Tabatabaei; Kameh Khasseh Khan; Negin Gavidelnia; Samad Ramzi. "On the Differential Effects of Computer-Mediated and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy". Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 10, 20, 2017, 151-168.
Tabatabaei, M., Khasseh Khan, K., Gavidelnia, N., Ramzi, S. (2017). 'On the Differential Effects of Computer-Mediated and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy', Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 10(20), pp. 151-168.
Tabatabaei, M., Khasseh Khan, K., Gavidelnia, N., Ramzi, S. On the Differential Effects of Computer-Mediated and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 2017; 10(20): 151-168.

On the Differential Effects of Computer-Mediated and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy

Article 8, Volume 10, Issue 20, Summer and Autumn 2017, Page 151-168  XML PDF (176.36 K)
Authors
Mir Ayyoob Tabatabaei email 1; Kameh Khasseh Khan2; Negin Gavidelnia2; Samad Ramzi1
1Payam-e-Noor University, Instructor, Salmas, Iran
2Department of English, Salmas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Salmas, Iran
Abstract
The present study investigated differential effect of two types of feedback namely, computer-mediated and metalinguistic, on Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy. To this end, based on Nelson Proficiency Test (300 A), 69 Iranian advanced EFL learners, including 45 males and 24 females, aged between 17 and 24, learning English in language institutes in Salmas, were selected randomly out of the total population of 121 EFL learners and then divided into three groups. The participants in the two experimental groups received metalinguistic and computer-mediated feedback separately while those in the control group received no feedback. The analyses of the results obtained through a pre-test and a post-test indicated that both feedback types significantly influenced learners’ writing accuracy. However, analysis of the participants’ performances on the post-test demonstrated that metalinguistic group outperformed computer-mediated one. Thus, the effect of metalinguistic feedback was more than that of computer-mediated feedback. In addition, both of them were more influential than no-feedback instruction. The findings of the present study can be fruitful for syllabus designers and EFL teachers. 
Keywords
computer-mediated feedback; Corrective feedback; EFL Learners; Metalinguistic Feedback; Writing Accuracy
Statistics
Article View: 225
PDF Download: 315